Create service

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only states the action and some required fields, failing to disclose side effects, return values, permissions, or async behavior. For a mutation tool, this is a significant gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no filler, front-loading the action. However, it sacrifices necessary detail for brevity, so it is concise but under-specifying.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 10 parameters, 0% schema coverage, no annotations, and no output schema, a single sentence is grossly insufficient. It does not explain the type enum, the meaning of other parameters, or what response/behavior to expect, making the tool extremely difficult to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description claims 'Requires type, name, project_uuid, server_uuid, and environment_name' but the schema requires project_uuid, environment_name, environment_uuid, and server_uuid. This misleads users about required parameters and ignores the large type enum and other optional fields, providing no meaningful coverage for the 0% schema description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new one-click service' with examples (database, cache). It uses a specific verb and resource type, but does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like createDockerComposeApplication or createDockerImageApplication.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage: this is for creating predefined one-click services, not custom Docker Compose or Dockerfile apps. However, no explicit when-to-use or exclusions are given, and no alternatives are mentioned despite the rich sibling set.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.