coolify-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to coolify-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for managing a self-hosted Coolify instance. Provides full REST CRUD, deploy/watch capabilities, and an optional host-ops tier for live log streaming, SSH, Docker, and database access.228 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Coolify API integration, enabling management of applications, databases, services, servers, and deployments via Claude Code or any MCP-compatible client.5 npm2MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for managing Coolify instances, enabling control of applications, databases, services, servers, and more via natural language.11617 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides integration with the Coolify API, enabling DevOps teams to manage Coolify deployments, applications, services, and servers through MCP tools.32164 npm46MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceOne MCP server to manage self-hosted Coolify instances: verify connectivity, discover servers, deploy applications, tail logs, diagnose incidents, and run emergency ops from any MCP client.1932 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Coolify infrastructure management, providing 45 tools for servers, applications, databases, deployments, and diagnostics via natural language.7 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 65 tools
Most tools are clearly resource-specific, but several overlap: listDeployments/listAppDeployments, getServerResources/listResources/diagnoseServer, and getLogs/getDeployment all deal with related deployment or resource information. Descriptions help, but an agent could easily misselect between the summary and diagnostic tools.
Verb-first camelCase naming dominates, but the pattern is broken by noun-only bundle tools like applicationEnvs, databaseBackups, storages, scheduledTasks, and teams. The generic control verb in controlDatabase and controlService is also a minor inconsistency, though the overall naming remains readable.
65 tools is well beyond the typical well-scoped range and creates navigation overhead. The broad Coolify domain justifies some size, but many list/query/diagnostic tools could be consolidated, and the count calibration explicitly marks 25+ as too many.
The surface covers most lifecycle operations across projects, servers, private keys, applications, databases, services, deployments, environment variables, storages, and scheduled tasks. Minor gaps exist—there is no getProject, no update/delete environment, and Github App/team management is read-only—but these are workable.