get_device_processor_info
Get CPU/processor details for a NinjaOne device using its device ID.
Instructions
Get CPU/processor information for a specific device.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| device_id | Yes | NinjaOne device ID |
Get CPU/processor details for a NinjaOne device using its device ID.
Get CPU/processor information for a specific device.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| device_id | Yes | NinjaOne device ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description fails to disclose behavioral traits such as read-only nature, permissions, error behavior, or return format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that communicates the core purpose effectively, though it lacks structured formatting.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Without an output schema, the description should hint at returned data (e.g., model, speed). It does not, making it incomplete for guiding tool selection and use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter described. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'CPU/processor information for a specific device', distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_device_disks and get_device_software.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, or any prerequisites or context for calling it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/fredriksknese/mcp-ninjaone'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server