Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to evipedia-mcp

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Analyzes PubMed medical literature to help researchers quickly gain insights into medical research dynamics, with features including literature retrieval, hotspot analysis, trend tracking, and comprehensive reports.
    150
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A bridge connecting AI agents to NCBI's PubMed database through the Model Context Protocol, enabling seamless searching, retrieval, and analysis of biomedical literature and data.
    12
    3,435 npm
    166
    Apache 2.0

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server that enforces evidence-graded, phase-gated, peer-reviewed research workflows for AI agents to conduct rigorous decision-making.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for CITED Health that allows AI assistants to query evidence-based supplement data, including ingredient evidence grades, health conditions, PubMed papers, glossary terms, and educational guides.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server for agentic systematic literature reviews with citation verification. Enables AI assistants to list reviews, get drafts, retrieve citation audits, and manage discovered papers.
    12 npm
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Clinical decision-support MCP server that lets AI agents reason over live FHIR patient data for medication review, appointment scheduling, and care gap identification.
    7,714 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that connects AI agents to the PEPTOMA open DeSci peptide research platform, enabling peptide sequence analysis, feed search, and peer-review annotations.
    18 npm
    MIT

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Scored across 8 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: catalog listing, discovery search, change feed, conclusion retrieval, full review, suggestion submission, and metadata. The descriptions explicitly differentiate similar tools (e.g., get_conclusion vs get_review vs get_metadata), making misselection unlikely.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (get_version, list_reviews, search_reviews, etc.), with clear and predictable names matching their actions.

Tool Count5/5

8 tools is well-scoped for an evidence review server, covering retrieval, discovery, metadata, and suggestion submission without redundancy or bloat.

Completeness5/5

The surface covers the full lifecycle: browsing, searching, reading conclusions, full reviews, metadata, recent updates, version check, and even proposing new reviews. No obvious gaps for the stated domain.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo recent community issues