thoth
Allows discovering and fetching open-access papers from arXiv for systematic literature reviews.
This server has a remotely hosted endpoint. Open its connector listing for connection details, authentication requirements, and setup instructions:
Thoth
Agentic systematic literature reviews — with every citation checked against the source.
Named for Thoth, ancient Egypt's ibis-headed god of writing and scribes.
The hosted app ran live in 2026 and is now retired. The screenshots and walkthroughs below are from it; you can still run it yourself.
What is Thoth?
Systematic literature reviews are slow to write — and when you ask an LLM to write one, it confidently invents citations and statistics that aren't in any paper.
Thoth does both halves and checks its own work. Give it a research question and
it discovers relevant papers, reads them, drafts an evidence-grounded review — then
runs a verification pass (cite_check) that compares every cited claim against the
source paper and flags anything unsupported before you read the draft. The result
is a review with a critic score, a citation-faithfulness percentage, and a per-claim
audit you can trust.
It ran (hosted, in 2026) as a polished web app, a public eval dashboard, and an authenticated MCP server your AI assistant could call directly; it still runs on your own machine or host.
Related MCP server: scholar-toolkit-mcp
See it work
Claude.ai catches 6 fabricated citations in a real draft — using Thoth's audit:
Connected to Thoth via the official MCP Registry, Claude calls
get_citation_auditon one deliberately-weak review (faithfulness 0.13 for that single review) and identifies all 6 unsupported claims — every one citing the same paper, with invented percentages that aren't in the source. This iscite_checkdoing its job: it's a single-review audit sample, not the golden-set aggregate (the/evalsdashboard had that).
Every claim, scored against its source — the /showcase review (no login needed). The figures on this card (critic 4.2/5, faithfulness 75%, 8/8 citations checked, 2 unsupported) are this one review's scores — a worked example, not the aggregate:
Evaluated in public — the /evals dashboard tracked inclusion recall / precision, claim faithfulness and coverage over an 18-question versioned golden set (7 of 18 have data at the latest sweep's commit), regenerated in CI and published with the last-run date (last run 6 July 2026, before the hosted app was retired), so a regression was a public, falsifiable signal:
You approve every step — three human-in-the-loop gates (review plan → review discovered papers → approve included papers); nothing runs unattended:
Key features
🔎
cite_check— verifiable citations. Every[paper_id]in the draft is scored against the cited paper and labelled supported / unsupported / unclear, so the LLM can't quietly hallucinate a citation. The verdict report is published per claim, not summarised away (claim faithfulness on the golden set: 38%). This is the core differentiator: the citations are measured, not asserted. Paper selection is scored separately: the papers Thoth includes are compared with each golden question's expected paper list — inclusion precision 97%, recall 74%, averaged over the 9 golden questions that have an inclusion score. That measures which papers it picks, not whether its citations are correct, and precision is 1.0 by construction on goldens with no distractor papers (see known limitations).🌐 Outbound web search (v2 — under active evaluation). An outbound
discoverer → fetcher → screenerpath is wired across OpenAlex, arXiv, and Exa: it fetches open-access PDFs, OCRs them, and screens each against your plan, so you can run uploaded-only, hybrid, or fully autonomous discovery. The discovery and screening axes are v2 and still being calibrated — they're tracked openly on/evals(both at 0% at the last run) rather than shipped as a silent claim.🔌 Authenticated, registered MCP server. OAuth 2.1 + PKCE + Dynamic Client Registration via Clerk, SHA-256 audit logging, rate limits — listed in the official MCP Registry. Most public MCP servers ship with no auth; this one doesn't.
📊 Public eval dashboard. Inclusion recall / precision, faithfulness and coverage over a versioned golden set, regenerated in CI and stamped with the last-run date, rendered at
/evals— an eval regression was a public signal, not a hidden one. The weekly eval run is retired; the last run was 6 July 2026.💸 6 LLM providers, $0/mo by default. Swap providers with one env var; the hosted app ran on the Mistral free tier, and the entire stack deploys on free tiers for $0/mo.
🚀 Quickstart
The hosted app ran live in 2026 and is retired, so run your own instance (below).
Connect it to your AI assistant — paste your deployment's MCP URL into claude.ai (Pro/Max), Claude Desktop, Cursor, or any MCP client (OAuth runs in your browser; no token to copy):
https://<your-host>/api/mcp/mcplist_reviews— your reviews with critic + faithfulness scoresget_review_draft— the markdown draft of a completed reviewget_citation_audit— the per-claim cite_check verdict reportlist_discovered_papers(v2) — papers the discoverer surfaced, with fetch + screening statusget_search_queries(v2) — the queries the discoverer generated + per-provider errors
Full reference: docs/mcp/tools.md · auth + audit model: docs/mcp/security.md
Run it locally:
git clone https://github.com/ahmedEid1/thoth.git && cd thoth
cp .env.example .env # Clerk + Trigger.dev keys + MISTRAL_API_KEY
docker compose up -d # postgres, minio, langfuse
pnpm install && pnpm prisma migrate dev
pnpm dev # Next.js on :3000
pnpm dev:trigger # Trigger.dev worker (separate terminal)Full setup, the agent pipeline, and the v2 flow: docs/architecture.md.
Proof
Hosted app | Ran live in 2026 (Clerk sign-in, sample review at |
Public evals |
|
MCP Registry |
|
Tests | 676 unit/integration + 22 live e2e against the deployed instance (MCP transport, real-browser, authenticated walkthroughs, full agent runs) — all green; tsc + lint clean |
Audit log | Every MCP call recorded with a SHA-256 input hash; no raw input stored |
Deploy cost | $0/mo — Vercel + Neon + Cloudflare R2 + Langfuse + Trigger.dev, all free tiers (self-host option) |
For engineers
Thoth is a LangGraph StateGraph driven by a Trigger.dev worker, with durable
human-in-the-loop gates, a per-run cost cap, and exactly-once gate delivery. Next.js 16
TypeScript (strict), Postgres + Prisma, Clerk auth (web + OAuth 2.1 for MCP), S3-compatible storage, Mistral OCR, Langfuse tracing.
Architecture — the agent pipeline, full stack, v2 flow, tests
LLM providers — the 6-provider matrix + resilience knobs
Security & privacy — data inventory, jurisdictions, deletion paths
Self-host — one VM on Oracle Cloud Always Free
Credits
Ibis icon by Delapouite under CC BY 3.0, via game-icons.net.
License
MIT © 2026 Ahmed Hobeishy
This server cannot be deployed
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Citepath public MCP server for LLM readiness audits and public scan results.
Auditable MCP server for PubMed, Europe PMC, ClinicalTrials.gov, and bioRxiv/medRxiv queries
Academic research MCP server for paper search, citation checks, graphs, and deep research.
MCP server that lets AI assistants use all OneSchema features exposed via the public API.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for verifying academic citations via Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, and CrossRef.128 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceComprehensive MCP server for academic research workflows, enabling paper searching across multiple sources, manuscript processing with citation placeholders, search caching, and citation export.11MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI agents to search and retrieve scientific papers, citations, and author profiles from Crossref, OpenAlex, and Semantic Scholar with no API keys required.519 PyPI3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables coding agents to search academic papers, ingest full-text PDFs, extract structured details, and manage citations in literature research workflows.32MIT