get_workout_by_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It does not state if this is a read-only operation, whether it requires authentication, or what happens if the workout_id does not exist. The description is too minimal to convey any behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (only one phrase), but it is under-specified rather than concise. Every sentence should add value, and this one fails to convey core purpose or usage. It does not front-load critical information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema and a single parameter, the description should clarify what the tool returns (e.g., full workout details) and how workout_id relates to other tools. It does not address these gaps, leaving the agent under-informed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate by explaining the parameter workout_id. However, the description says nothing about what workout_id represents (e.g., a unique integer identifier from get_workouts) or how to obtain it. The parameter is left completely unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '指定训练计划详情' means 'Specify workout plan details' in Chinese, but it doesn't clearly state that the tool fetches or retrieves a workout by its ID. The verb is vague ('specify' vs 'get'), and the resource is unclear ('details' vs the entire workout). It barely distinguishes from siblings like get_workouts (which likely lists workouts) and download_workout (which downloads).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_workouts (for listing) or download_workout (for downloading). The description does not mention prerequisites (e.g., having a valid workout_id) or context for usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.