get_activity_weather

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits. The description fails to indicate whether the tool is read-only, whether it requires authorization for the specific activity, or what side effects might occur. It provides no value beyond a cryptic title.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (one phrase), but it is under-specified rather than concise. It lacks essential information to justify its brevity, wasting the opportunity to clarify purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has one required parameter and an output schema, the description is completely inadequate. It fails to explain what input is needed, what the output represents, or how it differs from sibling tools like 'weather_now' or 'get_activity'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning neither the schema nor the description explains the 'activity_id' parameter. The description provides no additional meaning over the parameter name 'Activity Id'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '活动天气数据' is in Chinese and translates to 'activity weather data', which is vague and fails to state a specific verb or resource. It does not distinguish this tool from numerous weather-related siblings (e.g., 'weather_now', 'weather_forecast', 'weather_at').

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description offers no when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, and given the many sibling tools for weather and activities, there is no differentiation from alternatives like 'weather_at' or 'get_activity'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.