update_website_domain

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure, and it discloses nothing. It does not say whether the change is immediate or requires a reload, whether existing DNS/SSL config is affected, what permissions are needed, or what the response contains for this mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The text is short and front-loaded, but this is under-specification rather than conciseness. A single four-word fragment cannot earn its place as a tool description for a four-parameter mutation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a four-parameter write operation with no annotations, no output schema, and zero schema description coverage, the description is completely inadequate. An agent has no basis to call it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% across all four parameters (id, port, domain, websiteId), and the description adds no meaning for any of them. It does not explain the relationship between id and websiteId, nor what port refers to.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"Update website domain" essentially restates the tool name with no added specificity. It is unclear whether it edits a domain record's attributes (port, domain string) or reassigns a website's domain, and it does nothing to distinguish itself from siblings like create_website_domain, delete_website_domain, or update_website.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of the closely related siblings (create_website_domain, delete_website_domain, list_website_domains). The agent is left to infer everything from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.