get_dashboard_base_info
Retrieve essential dashboard information from a 1Panel v1.x server to monitor system status and key metrics.
Instructions
Get dashboard base info
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve essential dashboard information from a 1Panel v1.x server to monitor system status and key metrics.
Get dashboard base info
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure, and it discloses nothing about what data is returned, freshness, permissions, or side effects. It adds zero context beyond the name.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The single short phrase is not concise in a useful sense, it is under-specified. Brevity here reflects missing information rather than efficient communication.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no annotations, no output schema, and no descriptive content, the definition is entirely inadequate. An agent cannot know what this tool returns or when to invoke it.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to clarify about parameter semantics. Baseline of 4 applies for a no-parameter tool.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get dashboard base info' essentially restates the tool name (get_dashboard_base_info) without saying what 'base info' contains. It does not distinguish itself from nearby siblings like get_dashboard_current_info, get_dashboard_memo, or get_system_info.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no indication of when to use this tool versus the many sibling dashboard/system info tools. An agent has no basis from the description alone to choose it over get_dashboard_current_info.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.