get_dashboard_current_info
Retrieve current 1Panel dashboard metrics and status. Use to monitor server health and performance in real time.
Instructions
Get dashboard current info
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve current 1Panel dashboard metrics and status. Use to monitor server health and performance in real time.
Get dashboard current info
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full disclosure burden, and it discloses nothing about authentication, scope, freshness of data, or side effects. A one-line restatement of the name leaves behavior entirely opaque.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The single short phrase is not verbose, but it is under-specified rather than efficient — brevity here comes from omission, not from tight writing.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no annotations, no output schema, and 100+ siblings offering overlapping dashboard/system info, the description supplies nothing to help an agent call this correctly or interpret the result.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate; baseline 4 applies. No parameter semantics are missing.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
"Get dashboard current info" essentially restates the tool name without adding specificity. It doesn't clarify what 'current info' contains or how it differs from the adjacent get_dashboard_base_info, get_dashboard_memo, or get_monitor_data siblings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of the obvious alternative get_dashboard_base_info. The agent has to guess which dashboard-info tool to call.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.