force_close_workbook_by_path_tool

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It mentions 'force close' and 'without saving', but does not explicitly warn that unsaved changes will be lost. For a simple tool, this is adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with a single core sentence and structured Args/Returns. The Args line is redundant given the schema, but overall it is well-structured and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter tool with an output schema, the description covers the essential purpose, parameter, and return. It lacks guidance on when to use this over 'close_workbook' and a warning about data loss, but is largely complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description says 'Path to the workbook to force close', which adds minimal meaning beyond the schema's type 'string'. With 0% schema description coverage, more detail (e.g., format, requirement that workbook is open) would be expected.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'force close', the resource 'workbook', and the key qualifier 'by file path (without saving)'. This distinguishes it from sibling 'close_workbook' which likely saves changes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you want to discard changes by saying 'without saving', but it does not explicitly contrast with 'close_workbook' or provide when-not-to-use guidance. No alternatives are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.