learningsuite_list_webhook_subscriptions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It fails to mention pagination, ordering, error behavior, rate limits, or any authentication requirements. For a tool that may return a potentially large list, these omissions are significant.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence with no wasted words. It front-loads the essential information and is appropriately sized for a simple list operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description should at least hint at the return value or any important limits. It does neither, leaving the agent to assume a standard list of subscription objects. For a simple tool, this is adequate but with clear gaps regarding output structure and potential volume.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has 0 parameters, and the schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 4. The description does not need to add parameter semantics because there are none. It correctly implies that no input is required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get all webhook subscriptions' uses a specific verb 'Get' and names the resource 'webhook subscriptions,' clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_webhook_subscription (single), create/update/delete. It fully clarifies the scope as 'all' rather than a specific one.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The tool is self-evidently used to list all webhook subscriptions, with no explicit guidance on when to use it versus alternatives. The context of sibling tools implies it, but there is no direct mention of alternatives or exclusions. Because this is a simple list operation, the implied usage is sufficient for a minimum viable score.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.