version
Check the MCP server version and system information to verify setup and troubleshoot issues.
Instructions
Display version and system information
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Check the MCP server version and system information to verify setup and troubleshoot issues.
Display version and system information
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations, but description accurately indicates a read-only info retrieval. Lacks explicit mention of safety but benign nature is clear.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no redundancy, front-loaded. Every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple tool with no parameters or output schema. Could specify what 'system information' includes, but not essential.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters needed; schema coverage 100%. Baseline for 0 parameters is 4, and description correctly implies no parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states verb 'Display' and resource 'version and system information', specific and unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs siblings like Help, ping, etc. Usage context is implicit but not differentiated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/etheaven/codex-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server