Help
Access assistance and guidance for using the Codex CLI, including automation, sandboxed edits, and code analysis features.
Instructions
receive help information
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Access assistance and guidance for using the Codex CLI, including automation, sandboxed edits, and code analysis features.
receive help information
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits, but 'receive help information' reveals zero details about side effects, permissions, or limitations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short (two words) but lacks sufficient detail, making it under-specified rather than concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity (no params, no output schema), the description fails to explain what 'help information' means or how to use the tool, leaving major gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters and 100% schema coverage, so the description does not add meaning beyond the empty schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate as it offers no extra parameter insight.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'receive help information' states a verb and resource, but it is vague and does not specify what type of help or how it relates to other tools like ask-codex or brainstorm.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Sibling tools suggest a range of functionalities, but the description offers no context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/etheaven/codex-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server