Skip to main content
Glama
etheaven
by etheaven

Related Servers

Alternatives to codex-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server connecting Claude/Cursor to Codex CLI, enabling code analysis via @ file references, multi-turn conversations, sandboxed edits, and structured change mode.
      13
      113 npm
      24
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP server that brings a Codex-style coding workflow to ChatGPT, allowing it to read, edit, search, and run code in your local projects.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local MCP server enabling Codex and ChatGPT to read/write files, execute commands, manage processes, use Git, and inspect images on the user's machine with full privileges.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP server that lets ChatGPT securely read, edit, search, and run code in your local projects via an owner-approved connection.
      1,249 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes: ask-codex for general code tasks, batch-codex for sequential tasks, brainstorm for ideation, and utility tools. There is slight overlap between ask-codex and batch-codex, but descriptions clarify the difference.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names mostly follow a lowercase hyphenated pattern (ask-codex, batch-codex, fetch-chunk, timeout-test), but 'Help' is capitalized, breaking consistency. The mix of codex-specific and generic utility names also reduces pattern clarity.

    Tool Count4/5

    8 tools is a reasonable number for a Codex integration server. Includes core functionality (ask-codex, batch-codex, brainstorm), response retrieval (fetch-chunk), and utilities (help, ping, timeout-test, version). Slightly weighted with utilities, but still well-scoped.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers primary use cases: code analysis/generation, batch processing, brainstorming, and partial response handling. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit code review tool separate from ask-codex), but core workflows are supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues