unschedule_workout

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, description discloses that the workout is removed from calendar but persists in library, indicating non-destructive behavior. However, no details on errors, permissions, or side effects are provided.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the action, no wasted words. Every sentence contributes essential information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given low complexity (one parameter, no output schema), the description is adequately complete. It covers the purpose, parameter source, and effect on the library. Could be improved with failure scenarios, but not essential.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema already describes scheduleId with 100% coverage. The description adds value by specifying the source ('from get_scheduled_workouts response'), clarifying where to obtain the ID.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Remove a workout from Garmin Connect calendar' with a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes from siblings like delete_workout by noting the workout remains in library.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear guidance to use 'scheduleId from get_scheduled_workouts response', which helps in correct invocation. Lacks explicit exclusion or when-not-to-use compared to delete_workout, but context is sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.