Skip to main content
Glama
ehrodan

mcp-juridico-brasil

by ehrodan

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-juridico-brasil

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to Brazilian judicial data from DataJud CNJ and 91 courts, enabling process consultation, monitoring, and deadline calculation under the Civil Procedure Code.
      9
      35 PyPI
      107
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, and create/edit legal practice management data in Projuris ADV, including cases, people, tasks, updates, timesheet, files, contracts, subjects, court notices, service records, finance, and users via REST.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables querying public Brazilian court proceedings metadata and movements via the CNJ/DataJud API, covering multiple courts.
      3
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Brazil's Electronic Judicial Process (PJe) system to search for legal processes, view case details, and download court documents. Supports secure JWT authentication and process lookup by CPF/CNPJ or party name.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables semantic search, outcome prediction, and legal document drafting across 67M+ Brazilian court decisions from 55 tribunals, with tools for jurimetric analysis and citation verification.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP connector for querying Brazilian legal jurisprudence via JurisprudenciaIA. Enables natural language legal research using Claude.ai, with tools for consulting, searching, and comparing jurisprudence and legal theses.
      13
      -

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct resources, but the argument/document drafting cluster (construir_argumento_juridico, redigir_argumento_juridico, preparar_minuta_juridica, gerar_documento_word_juridico) has overlapping boundaries, and resumir_andamento could be confused with listar_movimentacoes. Descriptions help, but an agent still faces real selection risk.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools follow a consistent Portuguese snake_case verb_noun pattern such as buscar_processo, listar_movimentacoes, and sincronizar_corpus_juridico. Minor deviations like gerar_documento_visual_law and gerar_documento_word_juridico mix English terms, but the overall convention is predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 26 tools, the server exceeds the 25+ threshold and combines several subdomains: process tracking, LexML, local corpus, NRs, and legal document generation. The breadth is defensible, but the surface is heavy and would be more navigable if split into focused servers.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the main legal workflows: process lookup, movements, deadlines, monitoring, intimations, legal research, corpus maintenance, and document generation. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct jurisprudence search and no way to stop/remove monitored processes, but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues