Freshservice MCP server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Freshservice MCP server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server implementation that integrates with Freshdesk, enabling AI models to interact with Freshdesk modules and perform various support operations.59MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with Freshservice service desk, supporting ticket search, retrieval, and creation via a configurable, Docker-first deployment.MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that connects AI assistants to Freshservice Service Desk for ticket triage, asset analysis, and support history summarization.23-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server that provides 159 tools for interacting with the Freshservice ITSM platform, covering modules such as tickets, assets, and project management. It enables users to manage service desk operations and configuration through the Model Context Protocol.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI models to perform IT service management operations on Freshservice, including managing tickets, changes, problems, releases, assets, projects, and more through a set of MCP tools.362MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables LLMs to interact with ServiceNow instances for managing incidents, users, stories, workflows, knowledge base articles, and script includes via the FastMCP framework.-
TDQS
Scored across 59 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific resources and actions, such as create_ticket vs. update_ticket or filter_agents vs. get_agent. However, some overlaps exist, like get_tickets and filter_tickets, which could cause confusion in selection, though descriptions clarify differences.
The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern for most tools, such as create_agent and update_product. There are minor deviations, like getAgentGroupById using camelCase, but overall the conventions are readable and predictable across the set.
With 59 tools, the count is excessive for a typical MCP server, making it heavy and potentially overwhelming. This large number suggests poor scoping, as many tools could be consolidated or omitted without losing functionality for the Freshservice domain.
The tool set provides comprehensive CRUD and lifecycle coverage for Freshservice's domain, including agents, tickets, requesters, solutions, and more. There are no obvious gaps, with tools for creation, retrieval, updating, deletion, and filtering across all major resources.