rolldev_stop_svc

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only says 'stop' without detailing side effects, what services are affected, or whether it's destructive. Lacks clarity on behavior beyond the obvious.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely brief (one phrase), but concise. No wasted words, yet lacks detail that could improve usability without making it longer.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool, description is minimal; missing usage context and behavioral details. Agent may not know when to invoke or what consequences to expect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (one parameter described). Description does not add extra meaning beyond the schema field 'Path to the project directory', so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it stops RollDev system services, differentiating from siblings like rolldev_stop_project. Verb 'stop' and resource 'RollDev system services' are specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Does not mention prerequisites or typical usage sequence with other tools like rolldev_start_svc.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.