rolldev_magento2_init

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions 'automatic version configuration' which adds useful context about behavior, but doesn't disclose other traits like whether it creates files/directories, requires specific permissions, or handles errors. The description doesn't contradict annotations (none exist).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that efficiently conveys the tool's purpose and key behavioral trait ('automatic version configuration'). No wasted words, and the information is front-loaded with the main action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 3 parameters, 100% schema coverage, and no output schema, the description provides adequate context about what the tool does but lacks details on behavioral outcomes (e.g., what gets created, success/failure indicators). It's minimally viable but has gaps in completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents all three parameters. The description doesn't add any parameter-specific information beyond what's in the schema (e.g., it doesn't explain how parameters interact or provide additional examples). Baseline 3 is appropriate when schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action ('Initialize a new Magento 2 project') and the method ('using RollDev's magento2-init command with automatic version configuration'). It distinguishes from siblings like rolldev_start_project (which likely starts an existing project) by focusing on initial creation and version setup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for initializing new Magento 2 projects, but doesn't explicitly state when to use this versus alternatives like rolldev_start_project or rolldev_magento_cli. No guidance on prerequisites or exclusions is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.