akb_create_vault

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the tool creates a vault, and when external_git is used, it becomes a read-only mirror that rejects user writes and tracks on a polling schedule. However, it does not detail behaviors like potential failures or overwrite conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the main purpose. Every sentence contributes essential information, with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, so the description should explain return values. It does not mention what the tool returns (e.g., vault ID or confirmation). Given the complexity of parameters, the description covers creation logic but is incomplete regarding outputs.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds value by explaining the relationship between external_git and read-only behavior, and that template is ignored when external_git is set. It also clarifies the public_access parameter's effect.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and the resource 'knowledge base vault', and distinguishes two modes: normal vault and read-only git mirror. It also mentions access control, effectively differentiating from sibling tools like akb_delete_vault and akb_list_vaults.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear guidance on when to use the tool for vault creation and explicitly describes the git mirror alternative. However, it does not explicitly exclude other uses or mention when not to use the tool, though sibling context makes the purpose clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.