akb_archive_vault
Archive a vault to make it read-only. Only the vault owner can perform this action.
Instructions
Archive a vault (makes it read-only). Only the owner can do this.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| vault | Yes | Vault name |
Archive a vault to make it read-only. Only the vault owner can perform this action.
Archive a vault (makes it read-only). Only the owner can do this.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| vault | Yes | Vault name |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only states 'makes it read-only' and owner restriction, but omits details on reversibility, side effects, or permission requirements beyond ownership.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, no fluff, front-loaded with core action and effect.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with one param and no output schema; description is adequate but lacks detail on reversibility or post-archive state.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameters with basic description; tool description adds no extra meaning beyond 'Vault name', meeting baseline but not adding value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action (Archive), resource (vault), and effect (makes it read-only), distinguishing it from sibling tools like delete or create.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Mentions owner-only constraint but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like deleting or changing permissions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dnotitia/akb'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server