Skip to main content
Glama
dnic-dev

bw-modeling-mcp

by dnic-dev

bw_delete

Permanently delete SAP BW modeling objects (aDSO, InfoObject, transformation, DTP, or query) without activation. Removes objects immediately; deleting a query preserves referenced components.

Instructions

Delete a BW object permanently (aDSO, InfoObject, Transformation, DTP, Query, etc.). Sequence: lock (with /m) → DELETE → unlock. No activation needed — deletion is immediate. Queries (object_type "query", alias "elem") use a dedicated delete sequence; deleting a query does NOT delete the reusable components (variables, CKFs, RKFs) it references — only the query itself. Dependency note: delete aDSOs before their InfoObjects, not the other way around.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
object_nameYesTechnical object name (e.g. "OBJECT_NAME").
object_typeYesBW object type: adso, iobj, trfn, dtpa, query (alias elem), etc.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses permanent, immediate deletion, no activation needed, query deletion scoping, and dependency constraints. With no annotations, description fully carries the burden of behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Five sentences, front-loaded with main action, then sequence and clarifications. Every sentence adds distinct information; no redundancy or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers all essential aspects: deletion semantics, sequence, special cases (queries), and dependencies. No output schema needed; description is complete for this simple tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema already describes both parameters (100% coverage). Description adds value by elaborating object types, query alias, and contextual usage notes (dependency order), but does not introduce new parameter syntax.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb ('Delete') and resource ('BW object') with explicit examples (aDSO, InfoObject, etc.), distinguishing from sibling delete tools like bw_delete_transformation_routine.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit sequence (lock -> delete -> unlock), notes immediacy, and clarifies query deletion behavior and dependency order (aDSO before InfoObject). Lacks explicit exclusion of alternative tools but sufficiently covers when to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dnic-dev/bw-modeling-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server