bw_activate

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden. It discloses automatic unlock (except for DTPs) and that impact analysis may deactivate other DTPs requiring re-activation. It lacks details on idempotency or error conditions but covers key behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with multiple sentences but no fluff. It front-loads the purpose and efficiently communicates usage steps and post-activation behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description adequately covers usage, lock_handle, auto-unlock, and impact analysis response. It does not detail return values beyond deactivated DTPs, but is sufficient for a straightforward activation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds meaning by specifying lock_handle source, empty string for DTPs, and transport requirement context. However, the description mentions only three object types while the schema provides five enums.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool activates BW objects (aDSO, Transformation, or DTP) with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools that create or update these objects, as activation is a distinct action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit instructions on when to use the tool: after update operations, with lock_handle from specific update tools, and special handling for DTPs. It also mentions unlock behavior and post-activation steps, but does not explicitly state when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.