Skip to main content
Glama
just-prs-mcp
by dna-seq

Related Servers

Alternatives to just-prs-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A standalone MCP server that searches multiple scholarly metadata providers (PubMed, Europe PMC, bioRxiv, Crossref, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, arXiv), deduplicates results, and returns ranked literature with optional open-access full-text retrieval from Europe PMC.
      3
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying the EMBL-EBI catalog of published polygenic scores through read-only tools that search scores, traits, publications, performance metrics, sample sets, cohorts, and releases, and that trace GWAS studies and resolve ontology and ancestry identifiers. It also lists and downloads the associated scoring-file and metadata files from the catalog's FTP site.
      24
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Federates 13 gene-related MCP backends (gnomAD, GTEx, etc.) behind a single Streamable HTTP endpoint with collision-free namespacing and search-based tool discovery.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for querying the GWAS Catalog (EBI/NHGRI), a curated catalog of genome-wide association studies. It enables AI agents to search and retrieve study data via natural language or direct tool calls.
      127 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct action-resource pair: search, info, compute, post-process, report, and job handling are clearly separated. The main ambiguity is between compute_prs_batch and compute_prs_by_trait, which both handle multiple scores, though their descriptions clarify the one-genome-vs-many-genomes distinction.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority of tools follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern (compute_prs, list_genomes, build_prs_prompt, compare_genomes). A few noun-style names (best_performance, vcf_metainfo, percentile, absolute_risk, score_info, trait_info) break the pattern, but the overall convention remains predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 20 tools, this is on the heavy side and spans a very wide pipeline from catalog search to VCF normalization to reporting. The count is defensible for the domain, but some tools like percentile, absolute_risk, and assess_quality are narrowly scoped and could conceivably be folded into compute/interpretation results.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full PRS lifecycle: discovery, input preparation, computation, interpretation, comparison, reporting, and async job recovery. There are no obvious dead ends — job IDs feed prs_job_status, result paths feed compare_genomes/build_prs_prompt/plot_trait_panel, and computed z-scores feed absolute_risk.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues