tool_get_window_handles
Obtain a list of all active window handles to control and switch between multiple Chrome windows or tabs.
Instructions
Return all window handles.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Obtain a list of all active window handles to control and switch between multiple Chrome windows or tabs.
Return all window handles.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description does not disclose behavioral traits beyond what is implied, such as whether it returns a list or the format. No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden but is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise single sentence, but could include more behavioral context without being verbose. Appropriate for a simple getter.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description is minimally complete but lacks explanation of what window handles are or how to use them.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema description coverage is 100%. The description need not add parameter information; baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Return all window handles.' clearly states the verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like tool_switch_to_window which switches to a handle.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as tool_get_current_url or tool_switch_to_window. Lacks context for appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dlwjdtn535/mcp-chrome-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server