tool_get_log
Retrieve browser logs by specifying the log type to debug or monitor browser activity.
Instructions
Retrieve browser logs.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| log_type | Yes |
Retrieve browser logs by specifying the log type to debug or monitor browser activity.
Retrieve browser logs.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| log_type | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits like whether logs are cleared, what log types are available, or performance implications.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
While extremely short (2 words), this is under-specification rather than conciseness. It lacks essential details to be truly concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, no annotations, and only one parameter, the description is severely incomplete. The agent lacks information about valid log_type values, return format, and side effects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has a single parameter 'log_type' with no description, and the tool description does not mention it. With 0% schema description coverage, the description fails to add meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states 'Retrieve browser logs,' which clearly identifies the tool's action and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like get_cookies and get_current_url by focusing on logs.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to retrieve logs versus other browser data like cookies or credentials.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dlwjdtn535/mcp-chrome-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server