tool_fullscreen_window
Expand the browser window to full screen for an immersive and focused view.
Instructions
Switch the browser window to full screen.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Expand the browser window to full screen for an immersive and focused view.
Switch the browser window to full screen.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description carries full burden. It only states the action without disclosing effects on other windows, reversibility, or how to exit full screen. This is insufficient behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence with no fluff. While it could benefit from additional context, it earns a 4 for being efficient and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity, the description is somewhat complete but lacks mention of exit behavior or impact on existing windows. It is minimally adequate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, and the input schema has 100% coverage (empty). The description is adequate and does not need to add parameter details. Baseline for 0 params is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'Switch' and clearly identifies the resource 'browser window' and the target state 'full screen'. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like 'tool_maximize_window' and 'tool_minimize_window'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as maximizing the window or setting a custom size. The agent lacks context to choose the correct tool.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dlwjdtn535/mcp-chrome-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server