Skip to main content
Glama
dillip285

MCP Terminal Server

by dillip285
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Terminal Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Command Server

      Andrew-Beniash
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A secure server that allows LLM applications like Claude to execute whitelisted system commands with user confirmation and comprehensive security features.
      -

    • Shell MCP Server

      blazickjp
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A secure server that enables AI applications to execute shell commands in specified directories, supporting multiple shell types (bash, sh, cmd, powershell) with built-in security features like directory isolation and timeout control.
      1
      21
      Apache 2.0

    • Host Terminal MCP

      ankitaa186
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to execute terminal commands on a host machine with configurable, granular permission controls and safety protections. It features multiple security modes, including allowlists and manual approval, to ensure safe command execution within specified directories.
      6
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool 'execute_command' has a clear and distinct purpose that cannot be confused with any other tool in this set.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'execute_command' follows a verb_noun pattern, and with only one tool, the naming is inherently consistent. There are no other tools to compare against, so no inconsistencies can arise.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool for a terminal server feels too minimal for the apparent scope. While it covers basic command execution, typical terminal operations might include listing files, navigating directories, or managing processes, suggesting a gap in functionality.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for a terminal server domain. It only allows command execution, missing essential operations like file browsing, process management, or environment inspection, which are core to terminal workflows and will likely cause agent failures.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources