MCP Shell Server
MCP Shell Server
Um servidor seguro para execução de comandos shell que implementa o Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo (MCP). Este servidor permite a execução remota de comandos shell autorizados com suporte para entrada via stdin.
Funcionalidades
Execução Segura de Comandos: Apenas comandos autorizados podem ser executados
Suporte para Entrada Padrão: Passa entrada para comandos via stdin
Saída Abrangente: Retorna stdout, stderr, código de saída e tempo de execução
Segurança com Operadores Shell: Valida comandos após operadores shell (;, &&, ||, |)
Controle de Timeout: Define tempo máximo de execução para comandos
Related MCP server: Shell MCP Server
Configuração do cliente MCP no seu Claude.app
Versão publicada
code ~/Library/Application\ Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json{
"mcpServers": {
"shell": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"mcp-shell-server"
],
"env": {
"ALLOW_COMMANDS": "ls,cat,pwd,grep,wc,touch,find"
}
},
}
}Versão local
Configuração
code ~/Library/Application\ Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json{
"mcpServers": {
"shell": {
"command": "uv",
"args": [
"--directory",
".",
"run",
"mcp-shell-server"
],
"env": {
"ALLOW_COMMANDS": "ls,cat,pwd,grep,wc,touch,find"
}
},
}
}Instalação
pip install mcp-shell-serverUso
Iniciando o Servidor
ALLOW_COMMANDS="ls,cat,echo" uvx mcp-shell-server
# Ou usando o alias
ALLOWED_COMMANDS="ls,cat,echo" uvx mcp-shell-serverA variável de ambiente ALLOW_COMMANDS (ou seu alias ALLOWED_COMMANDS) especifica quais comandos podem ser executados. Comandos podem ser separados por vírgulas com espaços opcionais ao redor deles.
Formatos válidos para ALLOW_COMMANDS ou ALLOWED_COMMANDS:
ALLOW_COMMANDS="ls,cat,echo" # Formato básico
ALLOWED_COMMANDS="ls ,echo, cat" # Com espaços (usando alias)
ALLOW_COMMANDS="ls, cat , echo" # Múltiplos espaçosFormato da Requisição
# Execução básica de comando
{
"command": ["ls", "-l", "/tmp"]
}
# Comando com entrada stdin
{
"command": ["cat"],
"stdin": "Hello, World!"
}
# Comando com timeout
{
"command": ["long-running-process"],
"timeout": 30 # Tempo máximo de execução em segundos
}
# Comando com diretório de trabalho e timeout
{
"command": ["grep", "-r", "pattern"],
"directory": "/path/to/search",
"timeout": 60
}Formato da Resposta
Resposta de sucesso:
{
"stdout": "saída do comando",
"stderr": "",
"status": 0,
"execution_time": 0.123
}Resposta de erro:
{
"error": "Comando não permitido: rm",
"status": 1,
"stdout": "",
"stderr": "Comando não permitido: rm",
"execution_time": 0
}Segurança
O servidor implementa várias medidas de segurança:
Lista Branca de Comandos: Apenas comandos explicitamente permitidos podem ser executados
Validação de Operadores Shell: Comandos após operadores shell (;, &&, ||, |) também são validados contra a lista branca
Sem Injeção de Shell: Comandos são executados diretamente sem interpretação do shell
Desenvolvimento
Configurando o Ambiente de Desenvolvimento
Clone o repositório
git clone https://github.com/yourusername/mcp-shell-server.git
cd mcp-shell-serverInstale dependências incluindo requisitos de teste
pip install -e ".[test]"Executando Testes
pytestReferência da API
Argumentos da Requisição
Campo | Tipo | Obrigatório | Descrição |
command | string[] | Sim | Comando e seus argumentos como elementos de array |
stdin | string | Não | Entrada a ser passada para o comando |
directory | string | Não | Diretório de trabalho para execução do comando |
timeout | integer | Não | Tempo máximo de execução em segundos |
Campos da Resposta
Campo | Tipo | Descrição |
stdout | string | Saída padrão do comando |
stderr | string | Saída de erro do comando |
status | integer | Código de status de saída |
execution_time | float | Tempo gasto para executar (em segundos) |
error | string | Mensagem de erro (presente apenas se falhou) |
Requisitos
Python 3.11 ou superior
mcp>=1.1.0
Licença
Licença MIT - Veja o arquivo LICENSE para detalhes
Available Tools
1 toolshell_executeC
Execute um comando shell Comandos permitidos:
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| command | Yes | Comando e seus argumentos como array | |
| directory | Yes | Diretório de trabalho onde o comando será executado | |
| stdin | No | Entrada a ser passada para o comando via stdin | |
| timeout | No | Tempo máximo de execução em segundos |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It mentions 'Comandos permitidos: ' but doesn't specify which commands are allowed, security implications, or output behavior. This is a significant gap for a shell execution tool, as it lacks critical safety and operational details.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely brief but inefficiently structured, with 'Comandos permitidos: ' left incomplete. It fails to convey necessary information concisely, as the trailing text suggests missing content rather than purposeful brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a shell execution tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It doesn't explain return values, error handling, security restrictions, or allowed commands, leaving critical gaps in understanding how the tool behaves and what results to expect.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, with all parameters well-documented in the input schema. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema provides, such as examples or constraints on allowed commands. This meets the baseline for high schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states 'Execute um comando shell' which translates to 'Execute a shell command', providing a clear verb+resource combination. However, it's incomplete with 'Comandos permitidos: ' trailing off, making it vague about what commands are actually allowed. No sibling tools exist for differentiation, but the incomplete nature reduces clarity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or exclusions. It only states the basic purpose without context about appropriate scenarios or limitations, leaving the agent with no usage direction beyond the obvious.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
v1.0.0- First observed
shell_execute
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility for confusion or overlap between tools. The tool 'shell_execute' has a single, clearly defined purpose of executing shell commands, so disambiguation is perfect.
Since there is only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool name 'shell_execute' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, but with no other tools to compare, it sets no pattern to deviate from.
A single tool is too few for a server named 'MCP Shell Server', which implies broader shell-related functionality. While the tool covers basic command execution, the scope feels thin, lacking tools for tasks like listing files, checking processes, or managing environment variables that are typical in shell operations.
The tool set is severely incomplete for a shell server. It only provides execution, missing essential operations like file manipulation (e.g., read, write, delete), directory navigation, process management, or system information retrieval. This will likely cause agent failures when trying to perform common shell tasks beyond simple command execution.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Enable secure connectivity between Sentry issues and debugging data, and LLM clients, using a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server.
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to interact with yo…
MCP server for mandates, delegation, policy-gated execution, credential grants, and audit.
An authenticated remote MCP server for user-owned devices and one-shot capability invocation.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA secure shell command execution server implementing the Model Context Protocol (MCP). This server allows remote execution of whitelisted shell commands with support for stdin input.1198MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that allows LLMs to execute shell commands and receive their output in a controlled manner.7MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA secure terminal execution server that enables controlled command execution with security features and resource limits via the Model Context Protocol (MCP).130 npm11MIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceA server that uses the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to allow AI agents to safely execute shell commands on a host system.1167 npm9MIT