Skip to main content
Glama
devx-agent

devx-address-poisoning-check

Related Servers

Alternatives to devx-address-poisoning-check

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to check a payment recipient against the sender's own on-chain history before funds move, flagging address-poisoning look-alikes, spoofed 'from you' transfers, and fake tokens via the Blockscout PRO API. It also scans a wallet for poisoning attempts aimed at it, returning a verdict of OK, CAUTION, or STOP.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to assess the risk of crypto wallets, tokens, and smart contracts by providing read-only on-chain analysis, 0-100 risk scoring with explanations, fund tracing, and contract inspection before interaction.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run pre-sign risk checks on transactions, approvals, EIP-712 signatures, token addresses, wallet approvals, sanctions screening, and prompt-injection texts, returning green/orange/red verdicts with machine-readable reason codes before signing.
      1
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform pay-per-call security verification of wallets, tokens, contracts, dApps, agents, and more via a remote endpoint with no installation.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI agents to scan crypto transactions for scam addresses, clipboard-hijack patterns, and typos, as well as report scam addresses and check usage, directly in conversation.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to check whether a crypto token, link, or forwarded "gem" message is a scam by running contract rules, live test trades, creator history, and market data across 64 networks, returning plain-English or Pidgin verdicts. Also supports scanning messages, reviewing a token's past checks, and explaining individual findings.
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools do genuinely different things: one performs an offline lookalike/checksum check, the other only returns purchasing instructions. The name 'onchain_check_info' and the explicit 'Does not pay' note reduce, but do not fully eliminate, the risk that an agent calls it expecting an actual check to run.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Both names are snake_case, so there is no style clash, but the patterns differ: 'check_recipient_lookalike' is verb_object while 'onchain_check_info' is a noun-phrase/prefix form. Readable, but not a predictable convention an agent can generalize from.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is thin for a security-check server, and one of the two is purely informational rather than functional. The scope is narrow, so it is defensible, but the surface feels borderline under-built.

    Completeness2/5

    The free path covers only a single-address lookalike and EIP-55 check, with no batch checking, no trusted-address list management, and no offline screening against known poisoned addresses. The advertised on-chain scan is a dead end: the server exposes only purchase instructions, so an agent cannot actually execute it.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues