Get MO41 Document PDF

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the description adds only the fact that the output is a PDF. It does not disclose potential failure scenarios (e.g., if consignment has no MO41 document) or any other behavioral details beyond what annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two sentences, no fluff. The first sentence clearly states the primary purpose, and the second enumerates the required argument. All content is relevant and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity (single parameter, no output schema) and informative annotations, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks details on error conditions (e.g., missing MO41 document) or whether the PDF is returned as binary or URL.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter, consignmentId, is described identically in both the tool description and input schema ('Consignment ID'). Since schema coverage is 100%, the description adds no new semantic value. It merely repeats existing information.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns the MO41 document PDF for a consignment, specifying the verb 'Returns' and the resource 'MO41 document PDF'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_consignment_label_pdf or get_dangerous_goods_pdf by its specific document type.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., other PDF retrieval tools like get_consignment_label_pdf). There is no mention of prerequisites, when-not-to-use, or alternative methods.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.