Skip to main content
Glama
machship-mcp

machship-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to machship-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage global shipping operations, including rate comparison, shipment creation, label purchasing, tracking, pickup scheduling, address validation, billing, and analytics, via natural language.
      32 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to track packages, rate and create shipments, manage pickups and customs documentation, and perform international shipping logistics checks through natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous multi-agent logistics operations through MCP tools, resources, and prompts for routing, inventory, cargo inspection, disruption recovery, and conversational dispatch. It supports both modern and legacy MCP specs over stdio and HTTP, including secure API and feedback-optimized workflows.
      5
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants in Cursor and other MCP hosts to connect to a company REST API, handling token-based authentication, read-only lookups, and guarded job/package creation with optional shipping labels.
      16 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible applications to interact with local and cloud-hosted LLM models for model management, text generation, chat, embeddings, and web search/fetch.
      897 npm
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 125 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tool pairs are functionally near-duplicates: the PDF getters exist in two flavours (e.g. machship_get_consignment_label_pdf vs machship_get_consignment_pdf_file_info, same for item, manifest, dangerous goods and MO41), and machship_get_item_labels_zip vs machship_return_item_pdfs_for_consignments is explicitly the same operation with a different payload style. Search surfaces also overlap heavily: machship_search_consignments versus the three machship_get_consignments_by_reference1/reference2/carrier_id tools, and machship_search_locations vs machship_get_locations_exact vs machship_get_locations_with_options. On top of that, machship_create_quote and machship_get_routes both return carrier rate options, making selection genuinely uncertain.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost every tool follows a predictable machship_verb_noun snake_case pattern (get_, create_, update_, delete_, group_, upload_). Minor deviations exist: machship_ping has no verb_noun form, 'edit' is used alongside 'update' (machship_edit_consignment, machship_edit_company_location vs machship_update_custom_schema, machship_update_despatch_dates), and 'return' is used inconsistently (machship_return_identity_public_keys, machship_return_item_pdfs_for_consignments). These are small blemishes rather than a broken convention.

    Tool Count1/5

    125 tools for a single server is far past any reasonable agent-facing surface; selection cost and misselection risk dominate. A meaningful chunk of that count is redundant (duplicated PDF variants, POST-vs-GET duplicates, three location search variants), so the surface could be halved without losing capability. Even for a broad TMS domain, this is an extreme overload.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage across the freight lifecycle is genuinely deep: consignments (create/edit/delete/search/statuses/despatch dates), pending consignments, quoting and route shopping, manifests and rebooking, labels/PODs/commercial invoices, attachments, items, locations, identities/roles, organisation links, custom schemas and carrier invoice reconciliation. The main gaps are around items (there is create_item_complex and delete_item but no standard create_item and no update/edit item) and no manifest cancellation operation. These are minor and workable rather than blocking.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessSyncing