Skip to main content
Glama

remediate

Apply bulk remediation and generation tasks on OpenHAB items, including updates, equipment creation, tag suggestions, naming standards, persistence optimization, and snapshots.

Instructions

Bulk remediation and generation. action: bulk_update (batch tags/groups), create_equipment (auto-provision from thing), suggest_tags, standardize_naming, optimize_persistence, export_snapshot, boilerplate (TS types).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
actionYes
itemNamesNoUsed by: bulk_update
updatesNoUsed by: bulk_update
thingUIDNoUsed by: create_equipment
roomGroupNoTarget location group (used by: create_equipment)
itemNameNoUsed by: suggest_tags
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose whether operations are destructive or require specific permissions. It only hints at actions but lacks behavioral context like side effects or auth needs.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with the purpose sentence, but the inline list of actions is somewhat cluttered. Still, no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain return values, prerequisites, or side effects for a multi-action tool with 6 parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is high (83%), and the description adds minimal new information beyond the schema's 'Used by' notes. The action list is already in the enum.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description lists multiple actions without a clear single-purpose verb+resource. 'Bulk remediation and generation' is vague and does not differentiate from sibling tools like manage_thing or execute_batch.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. There is no mention of when not to use it or which sibling tool to use instead for specific sub-actions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/deswong/Openhab-MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server