openhab
Related Servers
Alternatives to openhab
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceServer that connects MCP (Multi-Capability Platform) with OpenHAB REST API, allowing MCP to interact with OpenHAB items through operations like getItemState and sendCommand.-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for full Home Assistant control, enabling AI agents to manage dashboards, automations, files, apps, entities, and more via REST API, WebSocket, and SSH.66129 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA local MCP server exposing the OpenAI platform REST API as tools for file management, fine-tuning, inference, images, audio, batch processing, and organization usage/costs.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA thin MCP server that securely enables AI agents to interact with Home Assistant, Mealie, and Nirvana via tools for automation, recipe management, and task tracking, while keeping credentials hidden.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects to Z-Wave JS UI's WebSocket to expose controller, node, and configuration information as tools for AI assistants to manage Z-Wave networks.24MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA standalone MCP server that exposes API endpoints as tools for AI assistants, using SSE transport.-
TDQS
Scored across 25 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, with descriptions explicitly noting when to use each (e.g., initial_discovery vs generate_home_blueprint). However, some overlap exists between resolve_item and query_items, which could cause confusion if descriptions are not carefully read.
Tool names primarily follow a verb_noun pattern (analyze_home, manage_item), but some are single verbs (automation, remediate) or nouns (mcp_status). This mixed pattern reduces predictability, though all names are still readable.
With 25 tools, the server is at the upper end of the 'borderline' range (16-25). While the complexity of a home automation system may justify this count, it feels slightly heavy and could benefit from consolidation.
The tool surface covers a wide range of OpenHAB operations: item/thing/rule management, queries, automation, media control, diagnostics, and system configuration. Minor gaps exist (e.g., backup/restore), but core workflows are well supported.