descope-mcp-server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to descope-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAllows programmatic management of a Dify instance, including listing and creating datasets, managing applications, and tool providers.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables programmatic management of a Dify instance, including datasets, apps, and tools.-

Connxio MCP Serverofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides tools for managing Connxio integrations, code components, environment variables, and security configs through the Connxio v2 management API.-
ConfigCat MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceProvides access to ConfigCat's management API for feature flag and configuration management, enabling CRUD operations on entities like feature flags, configs, environments, and products, as well as SDK documentation.95677 npm17MIT- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables interaction with the Admina API to manage and query organizational SaaS resources including devices, user identities, service integrations, and account information across multiple services.31326 npm6Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides tools to interact with the Attio API, enabling management of resources in an Attio workspace.5-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The tools 'create-user' and 'invite-user' have significant overlap in purpose, as both involve creating new users, which could cause confusion for an agent. The other tools target distinct resources (audits vs. users), but the core user creation ambiguity is problematic.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with hyphens (e.g., create-user, search-audits), making them predictable and readable. There are no deviations in naming style across the set.
With only 4 tools, the set feels thin for a user management and audit domain, potentially lacking operations like update-user, delete-user, or get-user. However, it covers basic creation and search functions, placing it in a borderline range.
For a user management server, there are significant gaps: no update, delete, or get operations for users, and audit functionality is limited to search only. This incomplete surface will likely cause agent failures in handling full user lifecycles.