screenslick_list_music
List built-in music tracks to select background audio for video editing in ScreenSlick.
Instructions
List built-in ScreenSlick music tracks.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List built-in music tracks to select background audio for video editing in ScreenSlick.
List built-in ScreenSlick music tracks.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description minimally discloses behavior as a read-only listing, but does not elaborate on return format or any side effects, which are minor for a list tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence of five words, front-loaded with verb and resource, no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description fully covers what is needed: it identifies the operation and the resource.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description adds value by specifying 'built-in', clarifying the scope of tracks beyond what the empty schema conveys.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('List') and resource ('built-in ScreenSlick music tracks'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like screenslick_list_effects and screenslick_list_sound_effects.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool or what to do with the results, though the purpose is straightforward given the simple list operation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/deifos/screenslick-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server