Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to screenslick

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables remote AI agents to control a local, authenticated desktop browser over MCP through an outbound WebSocket bridge and Chrome extension, supporting tab management, navigation, page reading, clicking, typing, scrolling, screenshots, and JavaScript evaluation.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to directly control a real Chrome/Edge browser via a WebSocket extension, supporting operations like navigation, clicks, screenshots, and JavaScript evaluation.
      18 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an AI agent to directly drive a live browser video editor session, reading selections and playhead, editing the timeline, and sharing the same undo stack as the human user.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control Godot game engine projects through a WebSocket bridge. Supports scene editing, node manipulation, script management, and project introspection via 163 registered tools.
      100
      1
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of the video editing workflow, such as generating content, listing assets, or applying edits. For example, 'generate_voiceover' creates audio, while 'add_transcript_voiceover_to_timeline' adds voiceover from a script, and 'generate_transcript' produces subtitles. The boundaries are clear, preventing confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent 'screenslick_verb_noun' pattern in snake_case. Verbs are descriptive (add, apply, generate, list, etc.), and even complex names like 'add_transcript_voiceover_to_timeline' maintain the pattern without mixing conventions.

    Tool Count4/5

    Seventeen tools is slightly above the typical well-scoped range of 3-15, but each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy. The count is appropriate for the domain, covering project inspection, asset listing, content generation, editing, and export.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the full lifecycle: project inspection, script/transcript/voiceover generation, applying edits via commands, silence removal, preview, and export. Minor gaps like individual effect removal are abstracted into the batch 'apply_commands' tool. Overall, it provides sufficient coverage for an AI-assisted video editing workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues