screenslick_capture_frame
Capture a PNG preview frame from the current editor at a specified time to produce a still image.
Instructions
Capture a PNG preview frame from the current editor.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| time | No |
Capture a PNG preview frame from the current editor at a specified time to produce a still image.
Capture a PNG preview frame from the current editor.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| time | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral context. It fails to disclose whether capture is destructive, what 'current editor' means, or any side effects. Only states the action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The single sentence is concise and front-loaded, but it sacrifices necessary detail. No extraneous words, but could include parameter info without being verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is incomplete: it omits output format (PNG data, file path?), default behavior without time parameter, and any context about the 'current editor' state. This leaves the agent guessing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the optional 'time' parameter – its purpose, default value, or format. The schema provides only a number type, leaving the agent without semantic understanding.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool captures a PNG preview frame from the current editor, specifying the verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools, none of which directly perform frame capture.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, scenarios for capturing a frame, or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/deifos/screenslick-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server