get_workspace

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It describes the output format (object ID, preview), explains how to access nested properties via object store, and mentions error messages. It implies a read-only operation, but does not explicitly state non-destructive behavior. Overall, it is transparent for a simple get operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured, front-loading the purpose and then detailing output and usage. It is slightly verbose with repetition (e.g., 'This tool retrieves' and 'Use this when'), but every sentence adds value. The docstring-style parameter description is included.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and a simple single-parameter input, the description provides comprehensive context: return format (object ID, preview), instructions for accessing nested properties via object store, and mention of error messages. It fully compensates for missing structured metadata.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage, but the description adds meaning by stating 'The name of the workspace to fetch details for.' This clarifies the parameter's purpose beyond the schema's title 'Workspace Name' and indicates it is required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool fetches detailed information for a specific workspace by name. It uses a specific verb ('Fetches') and resource ('workspace'), and distinguishes from siblings like list_workspaces (list all) and create_workspace (create).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides clear context for when to use the tool: 'Use this when you need detailed information about a particular workspace.' It does not explicitly exclude alternative tools like list_workspaces, but the purpose is clear enough.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.