deploy_index

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses that the tool attempts to deploy, returns validation errors on failure, and stores output with an object ID. However, it lacks details on prerequisites (e.g., index must exist) and implications of deployment.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is functional but somewhat verbose, with docstring-style param/returns and redundant mentions of object ID usage. It front-loads the main action but could be more streamlined.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description explains the return format and error handling but omits important context: it mentions 'in the given workspace' but the schema lacks a workspace parameter. Missing details on deployment effects and prerequisites like validation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description adds a clear definition for the single parameter 'index_name' ('Name of the index to deploy'). This fully compensates for the missing schema description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool deploys an index to production, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_index (creates but doesn't deploy) and validate_index (validates but doesn't deploy).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for deploying an existing index but does not explicitly compare to alternatives like create_index or validate_index. No guidance on prerequisites or when to choose this tool over siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.