get_secret

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavior. It states the secret value is not returned, output is stored, and an object ID is returned for referencing. It lacks details on auth needs, rate limits, or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is moderately concise but contains redundant phrasing (e.g., 'Use this tool to get information about a specific secret' reiterates the purpose). It front-loads the core action but could be tighter.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no annotations, the description covers retrieval, security nuance, and output format. However, it omits specifics like what metadata is returned, error case handling, and explicit object store usage instructions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%. The description adds minimal semantics by calling secret_id 'the unique identifier of the secret to retrieve,' which is a slight improvement over the schema's bare title. Given the low coverage, more elaboration is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the function: 'Retrieves detailed information about a specific secret by its ID.' It differentiates from siblings like list_secrets by emphasizing 'specific secret' and 'by ID'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says when to use: 'Use this tool to get information about a specific secret when you know its ID.' It also notes that the secret value is not returned for security reasons, implying alternative uses for other data.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.