arxiv-mcp

Overview Schema Source Related Servers Discussions Admin

get_paper

Fetch full metadata for one arXiv paper by its identifier. Retrieve title, authors, abstract, and category details for literature review and citation.

Instructions

Fetch full metadata for a single arXiv paper by identifier.

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`arxiv_id`	Yes	arXiv identifier, with or without version. Modern form '2401.12345', legacy form 'cs.LO/0112017'.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description
`doi`	No	Journal DOI when one is registered.
`title`	Yes	Paper title, whitespace-normalised.
`abs_url`	Yes	Canonical abstract page.
`authors`	Yes	Author names in the order arXiv lists them.
`comment`	No	Author comment, e.g. page count or venue.
`pdf_url`	Yes	Canonical PDF URL.
`updated`	Yes	Date of the latest revision.
`version`	No	Version of the record that was returned.
`abstract`	Yes	Abstract text, whitespace-normalised.
`arxiv_id`	Yes	Bare arXiv identifier without version, e.g. '2401.12345'.
`published`	Yes	Date of v1 submission.
`categories`	Yes	All categories the paper is tagged with.
`journal_ref`	No	Journal reference, when present.
`primary_category`	Yes	Primary arXiv category, e.g. 'cs.AI'.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedv0.1.0Oct 25, 2026

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavior burden. 'Fetch' signals a non-mutating read and 'full metadata' characterizes the payload, but nothing is said about behavior on an unknown or malformed identifier, version resolution defaults, or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, front-loaded with the verb and the resource, with no filler. Nothing could be removed without losing meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists and the sole parameter is richly described, so this short description is close to sufficient for a simple lookup tool. A note on how an identifier with versus without a version is resolved would close the remaining gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the single arxiv_id parameter is fully documented with modern and legacy forms. The description adds nothing beyond 'by identifier', so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Fetch') and resource ('full metadata for a single arXiv paper'), and the word 'single' implicitly contrasts with the bulk-oriented search_papers sibling. It stops short of naming or explicitly distinguishing itself from any sibling, so a 4 rather than a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: an agent can infer it should call this when it already holds a paper identifier, and that search_papers is the discovery alternative. There is no explicit when-to-use/when-not-to-use statement or named alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server