arxiv-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to arxiv-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching arXiv papers, extracting paper information, listing paper topics, and generating structured research prompts through MCP tools, resources, and prompts.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching and managing academic papers from arXiv with tools, resources, and prompt templates for literature review.1-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables an LLM to search arXiv by free-text query and download specific papers as PDFs through MCP tools.2MIT
- AlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and retrieve academic papers from arXiv through MCP tools, supporting search by various criteria, detailed paper information, category browsing, and PDF content extraction.453 npm2-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables agents to search papers across Semantic Scholar and arXiv, read and extract text from arXiv PDFs, align records across sources, and produce structured literature-analysis digests.101-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables local literature workflows by searching arXiv, retrieving paper metadata, downloading and parsing PDFs, and retrieving page-cited body evidence for Q&A. It also exposes usage resources and templates for searching, analyzing, and summarizing papers via stdio MCP.4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
search_papers (discovery), category_trends (aggregate stats), and get_pdf_text (heavy full-text path) are clearly distinct. get_paper and get_pdf_text both operate on a single paper by identifier, but the metadata-vs-full-text distinction and the explicit 'use only when the abstract is insufficient' caveat keep them separable.
Three of four tools follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (search_papers, get_paper, get_pdf_text). category_trends breaks the pattern as a noun_phrase, though it remains readable and unambiguous.
Four tools is on the lean side but each covers a genuinely different retrieval mode (search, metadata, full text, trends) with no filler. It is slightly thin for a research-paper server but not under-scoped.
The core lifecycle — find papers, read metadata, read full text, observe category activity — is covered with no dead ends. Minor gaps exist: no author-based lookup, no listing of recent papers by date, and no citation/export (BibTeX) helper, which agents must approximate via search queries.