Skip to main content
Glama
dear-pi

arxiv-mcp

by dear-pi

Related Servers

Alternatives to arxiv-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching arXiv papers, extracting paper information, listing paper topics, and generating structured research prompts through MCP tools, resources, and prompts.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and retrieve academic papers from arXiv through MCP tools, supporting search by various criteria, detailed paper information, category browsing, and PDF content extraction.
      4
      53 npm
      2
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables agents to search papers across Semantic Scholar and arXiv, read and extract text from arXiv PDFs, align records across sources, and produce structured literature-analysis digests.
      10
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables local literature workflows by searching arXiv, retrieving paper metadata, downloading and parsing PDFs, and retrieving page-cited body evidence for Q&A. It also exposes usage resources and templates for searching, analyzing, and summarizing papers via stdio MCP.
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    search_papers (discovery), category_trends (aggregate stats), and get_pdf_text (heavy full-text path) are clearly distinct. get_paper and get_pdf_text both operate on a single paper by identifier, but the metadata-vs-full-text distinction and the explicit 'use only when the abstract is insufficient' caveat keep them separable.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three of four tools follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (search_papers, get_paper, get_pdf_text). category_trends breaks the pattern as a noun_phrase, though it remains readable and unambiguous.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is on the lean side but each covers a genuinely different retrieval mode (search, metadata, full text, trends) with no filler. It is slightly thin for a research-paper server but not under-scoped.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle — find papers, read metadata, read full text, observe category activity — is covered with no dead ends. Minor gaps exist: no author-based lookup, no listing of recent papers by date, and no citation/export (BibTeX) helper, which agents must approximate via search queries.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues