arxiv-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| search_papersB | Search arXiv and return a page of matching papers. |
| get_paperA | Fetch full metadata for a single arXiv paper by identifier. |
| get_pdf_textA | Download a paper's PDF and extract text from its first pages. Slow and bandwidth-heavy - use only when the abstract is insufficient. |
| category_trendsA | Summarise recent submission volume and the most common title terms in a category. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| literature_review | Build a structured literature review from arXiv. |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| categories_resource | The arXiv category taxonomy this server can filter on. |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
search_papers (discovery), category_trends (aggregate stats), and get_pdf_text (heavy full-text path) are clearly distinct. get_paper and get_pdf_text both operate on a single paper by identifier, but the metadata-vs-full-text distinction and the explicit 'use only when the abstract is insufficient' caveat keep them separable.
Three of four tools follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (search_papers, get_paper, get_pdf_text). category_trends breaks the pattern as a noun_phrase, though it remains readable and unambiguous.
Four tools is on the lean side but each covers a genuinely different retrieval mode (search, metadata, full text, trends) with no filler. It is slightly thin for a research-paper server but not under-scoped.
The core lifecycle — find papers, read metadata, read full text, observe category activity — is covered with no dead ends. Minor gaps exist: no author-based lookup, no listing of recent papers by date, and no citation/export (BibTeX) helper, which agents must approximate via search queries.