sympy_sinh

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description is extremely minimal. It does not disclose any behavioral traits such as domain restrictions, handling of symbolic vs numeric input, or output format. This is insufficient for a tool that computes a mathematical function.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (two words), which is concise but at the expense of informativeness. It lacks structure and essential details, making it under-specified rather than efficiently communicated.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of sibling tools and the simplicity of the function, the description should at least mention that it computes sinh(x) and give hints about domain or behavior. The lack of annotations and brevity leaves the agent without enough context to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'expr' has description 'Expression' in the schema, which is vague. The tool description adds no further meaning. Since schema description coverage is 100%, baseline is 3, but the minimal description does not improve understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Hyperbolic sine.' clearly identifies the function as computing the hyperbolic sine of an expression. However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like sympy_cosh or sympy_sin, which are also trigonometric/hyperbolic functions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs alternatives. There is no mention of when hyperbolic sine is appropriate or how it differs from sin or other functions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.