sympy_WildFunction

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, return value characteristics, or pattern matching implications. The description fails to add behavioral context beyond the bare action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (4 words), but this is under-specification rather than concise effectiveness. It omits critical information that could be added without significant bloat.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (1 parameter), the description should provide enough context for an agent to understand its purpose and usage. It fails to explain the output, the role of Wild functions in SymPy, or how to properly use the 'name' parameter. The presence of an output schema does not compensate for this lack of guidance.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one required parameter 'name' with no description in the schema (0% schema description coverage). The tool description does not explain what 'name' represents or how it affects the created Wild function. This is a significant gap for a single-parameter tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it creates a Wild function, which is a specific action, but does not explain what a Wild function is in SymPy context, nor does it distinguish from the sibling tool sympy_Wild which creates a Wild symbol. The description is too vague for clear purpose identification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like sympy_Wild or other symbolic creation tools. The description lacks any context about typical use cases or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.