sympy_primepi

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description bears full responsibility. It minimally states the function's purpose but does not disclose behavioral details such as domain of n (integer, all numbers?), range (nonnegative integer?), or edge cases (e.g., n<2 returns 0).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (3 words), which is efficient but omits essential information. It is front-loaded with the core concept, but the conciseness comes at the expense of clarity and completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has one parameter and an output schema (unseen), the description is insufficient. It does not explain what the function returns or how to provide input, leaving the agent to infer crucial context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no meaning to the single parameter 'n'. With 0% schema description coverage, the description should compensate by explaining n's type and role, which it fails to do.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Prime counting function' clearly states the tool counts primes, which is a specific verb+resource. However, it does not distinguish among many prime-related siblings like sympy_isprime, sympy_prime, sympy_nextprime, etc., missing an opportunity to clarify differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines provided. The description does not specify when to use this tool over alternatives (e.g., when to count primes vs. check primality or get the nth prime). No when-not or prerequisite context is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.