Skip to main content
Glama
daedalus
by daedalus

set_copyright

Set the copyright notice for an RFC document by specifying the year and holders.

Instructions

Set the copyright notice of an RFC document

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
documentYesRFCDocument
yearYesCopyright year
holdersYesCopyright holders
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description only states it 'sets' the copyright, without disclosing side effects (e.g., overwriting existing notice), permissions, or limitations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no extraneous information. Efficient and to the point.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, and the description lacks behavioral context for a mutation tool with three parameters. Could mention overwrite behavior or constraints.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% parameter description coverage, so the schema provides meaning. The description does not add further clarification beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Set', the resource 'copyright notice', and the context 'RFC document'. It differentiates from sibling tools like 'get_copyright' (read vs write) and other set_* tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs 'get_copyright' or other alternatives. Missing context on prerequisites or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/daedalus/mcp-rfc-editor'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server