Skip to main content
Glama
daedalus
by daedalus

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-rfc-editor

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for obtaining, parsing and reading RFC documents from the ietf.org website, providing programmatic interactive tools.
      3
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables programmatic access to IETF RFC documents, allowing users to fetch, search, and extract specific sections from RFCs.
      3
      30 npm
      19
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Python-based text editor server built with FastMCP that provides tools for file operations. This server enables reading, editing, and managing text files through a standardized API following a multi-step process.
      14
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for reading, editing, and validating Microsoft Word documents with specialized support for track changes, comments, and footnotes. It enables structural auditing, heading extraction, and precise OOXML-level document manipulation through natural language tools.
      100
      411 PyPI
      50
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides tools for analyzing, linting, formatting, and generating Markdown content. It enables users to programmatically manage Markdown files through features like table of contents generation, statistics calculation, and JSON-to-table conversion.
      22 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, with getters/setters for specific fields and section operations. However, 'update_section' and 'set_section_by_title' are ambiguous as both update a section, and the distinction between them is unclear from descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming pattern is largely verb_noun with 'get_' and 'set_' for attributes, and 'add_', 'delete_', 'update_', 'list_' for sections. Deviations include 'to_dict' and 'set_section_by_title' which is a longer form, but overall consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    29 tools is relatively high for a document editor, with individual getters/setters for each field. While this provides clarity, it may be excessive; a more streamlined set with fewer, more generic tools could suffice.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers core RFC editing operations: download, load, save, create, metadata fields, and section management. Minor gaps include lack of tools for section reordering or retrieving full document text directly.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues